Historical data rejects. It does not approve.
A good backtest only suggests the strategy is worth further testing.
Trading strategy mining
Your agents generate millions of strategies and test them on historical market data. A statistical filter discards almost all. The few that remain operate for months on paper, with real prices. Here you see the entire process, step by step.
A good backtest only suggests the strategy is worth further testing.
The trades a strategy makes from its discovery, on paper and with real prices.
It is measured in trades, not days. More computers do not speed it up.
Six steps, from assignment to the trading floor.
An agent is a search process dedicated to an asset and a timeframe: for example, BTC on 1-hour candles. It does not predict the market and does not trade on its own: it searches for rules and puts them to the test.
Each strategy is a short rule: one or two entry conditions, one exit, a stop, a target, and a maximum duration. The components come from a closed catalog of 24 known indicators (moving averages, RSI, channels, MACD…). Combining them yields over a hundred billion different rules.
The historical market data is split into three segments by date. The agent only sees the oldest segment. The other two remain on the server: one for filtering and another that is looked at only once, at the very end. This way, a rule cannot memorize the data it will later be tested on.
By testing millions of combinations, some will always appear that would have won by chance. That's why the bar rises with each strategy tested: the more tests, the more a strategy must prove. All tests are counted, including those from other campaigns on the same asset.
In technical terms: a Sharpe ratio deflated by the number of tests.
Passing the filter does not grant entry to any trading floor. First, the strategy paper trades: the server follows its signals with real market prices and without real money. This is intentionally slow: a strategy on 1-hour candles might only make a few trades per month. After 30 trades, the examination arrives: if in paper trading it doesn't resemble what it promised, it is discarded.
On a trading floor, you see what each strategy has done in paper trading since it was found. The ranking does not use backtests: it sorts by a conservative score, which considers the minimum to expect rather than the average. Few very good trades are worth less than many regular ones.
1 R is what a strategy risks in one trade: the distance between the entry and the stop. If the stop is hit, the trade loses 1 R. If it reaches a 3 R target, it wins three times that amount. Commissions and slippage are subtracted from each result. Measuring in R allows comparing strategies across different assets and sizes.
A price line starts from the entry. If it reaches the target, which is three times further than the stop, the result is +3 R. If it drops to the stop, the result is -1 R.
Why a backtest doesn't decide anything here
We mined a million strategies on invented prices, where there is nothing to find. In the backtest, the ten best earned +0.26 R per trade. In the unseen data, they lost 0.05 R per trade. That's why a backtest doesn't decide anything here.
candidates tested
How to read it: the more candidates tested, the better the backtest of the ten best performs. What they do afterward remains slightly below zero. The distance between the two lines is luck.
Eight synthetic series with no edge, 5 years of 1-hour candles.
A room is a collection of strategies with their paper trading history. From the outside, you see a summary that is updated once a week: trading bracket, approximate score, and whether it has a badge.
Score: the minimum expected from the strategy per trade, in R, based on what has been observed so far. It's intentionally conservative: with few trades, it may appear negative even if the strategy is performing well.
Badge: the score is already above zero based solely on its own paper trades. A good strategy needs about 200 paper trades to earn it.
With fewer than 30 paper trades, it does not enter the ranking.
Each agent works with one asset and one timeframe, with a limited testing budget: over-testing does not improve the result, it worsens it.
You install a small program. It only performs calculations: it does not store exchange keys, only opens outgoing connections, and pauses on battery power. If you participate in an open room, you accumulate discount credits.
This is not a way to make money with your computer.
Your device receives a batch of candidates and calculates them.
It sends a sealed summary of its results, before knowing what it will be asked.
The server randomly selects which parts to check and recalculates them.
Only work that passes this check counts.
It does not predict the market.
It does not touch your money or store your exchange keys.
It does not tell you what to trade.
It does not convert a good backtest into a good strategy. Only time tells that.
Plans differ by the number of agents and rooms.
For now, sign-up is closed: accounts are created by the platform. Tell us about your case and we will get back to you.
Go to the contact formA search process dedicated to an asset. It generates strategies, tests them, and delivers those that pass the filter. It does not predict the market and does not operate on its own.
No. You can mine on your computer or hire computation. If you mine yourself, the program pauses with battery.
No. The platform does not connect to your exchange or store keys.
Because testing millions of combinations always turns up one that would have won by chance. The filter is for that purpose.
A discount on your fees for the work your team contributes. They are not money and cannot be withdrawn.
We do not provide personalized recommendations or tell you what to trade. What you see are results from paper tests.